Sunday, 4 June 2017

Why can’t we simply forget about the Piezoelectric Roads, it’s a highway robbery!

The concept of piezoelectric roads has been around for many years, because of some obvious reasons this has never be implemented in reality. However, I am surprised that there are still people, even some academics, come up and propose this idea as if it’s a real sustainable and renewable energy source, every now and then.

The piezoelectric effect is where the electric charge accumulates in materials, such as certain crystal and ceramics, in response to mechanical stress. In simple words, if such materials are used on the surface of motorway, pressures and impacts from passing by vehicles can be used for generating electricity.

Estimation on piezoelectric roads shows that “1 km of runway can produce up to 500 kWh of electricity per hour” by harvesting “energy from weight, motion, vibration and temperature changes.” Woohoo! Free, long term and sufficient energy come from nowhere, must be green and sustainable! But isn’t this something too good to be true?
If you are having some doubt like me, you are 100% correct. This is not some magical clean energy come from nowhere or collected from wastes, this is an energy robbery from the passing by vehicles, which is essentially non-sustainable fossil energy.
We all know there is a certain law called conservation of energy. In order to make the car to move, the engine burns fuel, convert fossil energy into heat energy, burst the air and push pistons to convert it into motion energy, passing such motion through transmission to the wheels, after wasting much on fiction to the road surface and air, we eventually convert fossil energy in the fuel into the kinetic energy that moves the vehicle. The efficiency of the whole process would not be more than 15%, i.e. 85% of the fossil energy has been wasted in order to push our car to the expected speed.
Now, in order to generate piezoelectricity, the precious kinetic energy has to be converted back into electricity by adding humps to the road or increasing the surface fiction and slowing down the vehicle. This is literally robbing money from the passing-by drivers who paid the fuel for moving their cars, and in the most inefficient and unsustainable way.
During the recent study and researches, I have identified that there are many so-claimed sustainable energy/solutions are actually anti-sustainable. Some need to be considered from environment impacts of the full life cycle, some simply decorates non-sustainable methods with fancy names, but the concept of Piezoelectric Roads is totally a post-truth, i.e. bullshit, that has been repeated many times. I wonder when can we reach a full stop of this?

Saturday, 3 June 2017

Electric road in operation

Around the same time last year, the so claimed world’s first electric road opened in central Sweden, it is a 2-kilometre strip on the motor way where trucks can switch to non-fossil energy (through the pantograph power collector on the top). This was reported as a pioneer technology for sustainable energy and a milestone for the renewable energy transportation, however I was deeply confused.
I am confused not because this technique is too difficult for my brain, but because such “hybrid” vehicles was running everywhere in my city while I was a child, and since when it became a ground-breaking technique again in the western world?
Characterised by the two long “plait” on top of the bus, the electric driven buses were used for decades in China and are still in use in some cities. This might not be driven by a green source of electric power such as solar power, however electric is electric, I have no idea how an ancient technique can be repacked as an evolutionary renewable energy solution.
Well, I guess it’s not always about true or false in the massive “green” energy industry, decorated ideas that attract more funding and profits play a more important role.

Not just material recycling, but also spirit inheriting

My No. 1 favourite architect, the first Chinese citizen winner of the Pritzker Prize, Wang Shu is known as a material master because he always re-uses materials that are salvaged from the demolished traditional local buildings. Tiles, in particular, are one of the important form in Shu’s material palette.
While Shu designed the Xiangshan Campus, China Academy of Art in Hangzhou, he and his team rescued more than 2 million old tiles from the local traditional houses demolished by the government, and used these to build the walls, roofs and grounds in the campus.

Last October, I visited the Xiangshan Campus and I cannot be more amazed and impressed by Shu’s work. It appears to be a nice example of integrating the recycling and sustainable concepts with traditional Chinese aesthetic, however there is a lot more than that.



Shu believes materials are not just materials, experiences, memories and spirit are embedded in these rescued tiles. While I stared at the walls, the roofs, I could help to wonder: who are the people who used to live under these tiles, and what kind of stories have happened in those demolished houses.
I was so touched because I did feel the history and the spirit carry by these materials.

Cambodian Slums

The south-east Asian country Cambodia, after many years of civil war, is known for its poverty and under-development. Although around 80% of the total population live in the rural area, there are more than 1.5 million (more than 10% of the total) inhabitants were living in the capital city Phnom Penh by 2012. The population growth in Phnom Penh was boosting dramatically from 189,000 to 1.5 million within 34 years (1978-2012), and will be some predicted figure of 3 million by the end of 2016.

As a consequence of the rapid city expansion, more and more slums appear along the skirt of the city, and presents miserable living conditions with lack of essential infrastructure, such as sanitation, waste removal, clean water and electricity.
According to the 2014 Cambodia national demographic and health survey, “one in every 36 Cambodian children die before their first birthday, and one in every 29 do not survive to their fifth birthday”. It is not surprising to find this causal relationship considering 35% of Cambodian households (dry season) are still obtaining their drinking water from non-improved sources (e.g. surface water, tank water etc.)
We generally understand the source of slums is the poverty, however according to the data from the World Bank, the poverty rate in Cambodia was constantly drop from 47.8% in 2007 down to 13.5% in 2014, with 90% of the poor live in the countryside. If the poverty is no longer the most significant problem, why more and more slums emerge after so much efforts and economy growth?
In my opinion, the main reason of the Cambodian slums now-a-day is the imbalanced growth of regional economy. The economic boost in the urban area attracts large population to the capital city, and in turn generate more demands on resources and infrastructure that the city cannot afford. The quicker the city develops, the more incoming migrants from the rural areas for new opportunities.
The local resources are limited and unsustainable for fulfilling the demands from fast growing population. In order to solve the slum issue in the long term, focusing on localised solutions, such as building more infrastructure, is not sufficient. The best direction, IMO, is to design and implement more sustainable policies that distribute investments more towards the rural areas. Only when the country boys have similar opportunities as the city people, the slum issue can eventually be solved and eliminated.
National Institute of Statistics (NIS), Directorate General for Health, and ICF International, 2015. Cambodia Demographic and Health Survey 2014. Phnom Penh, Cambodia, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: National Institute of Statistics, Directorate General for Health, and ICF International.

Black waters in Caley Valley Wetlands – An eco-bomb in the Great Barrier Reef?

What a coincidence that our due date (04/Jun) is the same day as the world ocean festival, or was it set to on purpose? This reminds me to have put some contents about the ocean.
A couple weeks ago, a Uni colleague brought my attention to the black water incident at Caley Valley, and I then did some researches online.

Apparently the two satellite images below lead to accusations against Adani, the mining company owns and runs the Abbot Point Coal Terminal in north Queensland. Both images were supplied by the Queensland government, and the left one shows the wetlands before the waste water release, whilst the right picture was taken after the Cyclone Debbie hit, in which the wetlands have obviously turned black.
 Before Waste Water Release
After Cyclone Debbie Hit

Most people got shocked by the change and debates have been focused on the following topics: 1. Is the water black or only appears to be black on the satellite image? 2. Is it a coal spill to the wetland or anything else such as magnetite? 3. Was it a natural wetland or a man-made swamp for duck hunting?
Although Adani has been arguing that the picture was simply because of different reflection, however the follow-up drone video clearly showed this was a lie. Adani then said the company had obtained the appropriate licence and there has been no breach to the conditions.
I have no idea on how the licence is set and under what regulation, but considering the already fragile eco-environment in the great barrier reef, shouldn’t more strict regulations be applied in this area? No matter it’s fault of Adeni or Debbie, coal or magnetite, dumping waste water to such an easily overflowed area is never a wise solution IMO.


Garbage Incineration in China

As 1.4 billion people living in this country, China creates more than 360 million tonnes of domestic waste every year. Around half of the garbage goes to landfill, less than a quarter is burnt or used fertiliser, and the rest is not properly treated. Landfill requires a lot of land and generate foul odours, as the land and real estate price went crazy in China, incineration has become an ideal choice for major cities.
The government has set main priority on building new garbage incinerating plants, and we saw a boost in new facilities between 2008 and 2015. More than 100 billion Yuan (AU$20 billion) has been invested in this sector, and by the end of 2020, the country will have a total of 300 incinerators that are capable to process 300,000 tonnes of garbage per day.
Actually, burning the garbage is a profitable business in China, and with the incentive from the government, it’s even more profitable than many other industries. The raw material, garbage, is free of charge or even paid to collect. The electricity generated from burning garbage can feed back to the grid at a generous buyback price. One side-effect is, in the past, some incinerator managers even added coal to the garbage in order to generate more power for profit.

However, the incinerating is apparently far from ideal as a main garbage process means. There is, so far, no enforced garbage sorting rules in China, residual and recyclable wastes are generally mixed together, and sometimes even contain waste with chemical hazard. There are no clear regulations to govern the operation and pollution prevention in these projects. The existing standards were out-of-date and vague as these were made up in the late 1990s. Residents need the incinerators have objected and protested to the government in many cities, because of the fume, odours and other forms of pollutions.

The waste treatment is definitely most challenging in China than any other countries due to the massive population, however I believe the current policy, either land fill or incineration, is quite crude and non-sustainable. Waste treatment industry should not be evaluated only by the profitability, and garbage categorisation and sorting are the most important step before any industrial handling process.

Smarter than VIC’s offshore wind farm? China’s floating solar farm

The city of Huainan, China, is small city always known for its coal mine. However, who would imagine such a city of “dirty” fossil energy has become a pilot in the renewable energy industry?
The world’s largest floating solar plant has been established on an area of water in Huainan. This solar farm is able to produce 40MW of power and to supply clean energy to the city.

Putting the panels out on the water has a number of benefits, such as not taking up precious farm land or real estate, reducing the evaporation from the reservoir, utilising the cool wind above water to prolong the life of panel and increase the production efficiency.

And the sweetest part of this project is that the water is a naturally flooded former coal mining land. Due to the previous mining work, such flooded area is not suitable for either recreation or food production purposes, thus there’s little ecology concern in implementing massive facilities at such area.

Comparing to the wind farm VIC government plans to build over the sea, and the money it plans to spend, scalable solar farm on a waste land seems to be a smarter plan to me.



http://www.designboom.com/technology/sungrow-floating-solar-plant-huainan-china-05-25-2017/